N,N-disubstituted, α-(3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-disubstituted acetamides and composition stabilized therewith

ABSTRACT

N-substituted, N-(polysubstituted-4-piperidinyl)-α-(3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-.alpha.,α-disubstituted acetamide (&#34;3,5-DHPIPA&#34;) generates an exceptionally stable hindered acetamide aroxyl radical which is far more stable than the &#34;blue aroxyl radical&#34; derived from 2,4,6-tri-tert-butyl-phenol, which radical was heretofore adjudged the standard of superior stability and resistance to degradation due to heat, oxygen and light, the compound having been specifically disclosed as a uv-stabilizer. The hindered aroxyl amide radical which is at least ten times more stable than the &#34;blue aroxyl radical&#34; heretofore deemed stable, may be generated by 3,5-DHPIPA compounds prepared by a peculiarly effective synthesis known as the ketoform reaction. This ketoform reaction is unexpectedly well-adapted to produce the 3,5-DHPIPA compounds which we have been unable to produce by any other synthesis known to us. The stability of the hindered aroxyl amide radical inculcates an organic material in which a 3,5-DHPIPA compound is dispersed, with excellent stability. The use of a combination of 3,5-DHPIPA compounds, or a combination of a 3,5-DHPIPA compound with known stabilizers, particularly the phosphites and benzophenones, in a small but stabilizing amount, provides especially effective stabilization in polyolefins and a host of other synthetic resinous materials.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part application of Ser. No. 022,183, now abandoned, filed on March 5, 1987, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of application of Ser. No. 713,715, now abandoned, filed on March 20, 1985, which in turn is a division of Ser. No. 549,036, now abandoned, filed on November 7, 1983.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The novel compounds of this invention are N,N-disubstituted α-(3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-disubstituted acetamides ("3,5-DHPA" for brevity) in which one of the substituents on the N atom is a polysubstituted piperidyl group, more correctly referred to as "N-substituted, N-(polysubstituted-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-.alpha.,α-substituted acetamides" hereinafter, referred to as "3,5-DHPIPA" for brevity. These compounds have never heretofore been made because the tertiary alpha-carbon ("alphaC") atom (alpha relative to the phenyl ring) of any reactant from which such a compound might have been derived, is so hindered that it does not permit reaction with an amine to form the amide which, conventionally, one might expect to be formed. By "tertiary" C atom we refer to a C atom bonded only to C atoms. The distinctive feature of our acetamides is that the tertiary C atom, referred to as "the alpha C atom" because it is alpha to the hydroxyphenyl ring, and also alpha to the carbonyl C atom, is disubstituted. In other words, there is a single disubstituted C atom connecting the hydroxyphenyl ring to the carbonyl C atom of the acetamide.

3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl organic compounds, referred to as "hindered phenols" because of the substituents on the ring C atoms flanking the ring C atom carrying the hydroxyl (OH) group, have been of great interest for some time because of their stabilization activity. This interest derived from the discovery that such compounds were excellent antioxidants, this property in turn, being related to the stability of the aroxyl radical represented by the typical structure ##STR1## wherein the "cross" substituents represent t-butyl, written out in greater detail on the 1-C atom. It was, until the discovery of the 3,5-DHPA radical, one of the most stable aroxyl radicals known. This prior art aroxyl radical was referred to as the "blue aroxyl" in a lecture titled "The Blue Aroxyl, The First Stable Oxygen Radical, Its Discovery and Its Properties" given by Eugen Muller, in Lisbon on the 28th of May 1973 and printed in Rev. Port. Quim. 14, 129 (1972). The radical was referred to as "blue" because of the distinctive dark blue crystals obtained by shaking the benzene solution of 2,4,6-tri-tert.butylphenol with potassium ferricyanide in aqueous alkali.

Since the effectiveness of hindered phenols to stabilize an organic material, subject to degradation due to heat, oxygen and light, appeared to be correlated to the stability of the aroxyl radical generated by exposure of the organic material, it seemed likely that modifications in the structure of such hindered phenols, particularly those modifications relating to the substituents on the 1-C atom of the phenyl ring, might provide aroxyl radicals which were more stable than those of the prior art. The quest appeared to devolve upon finding which particular substituent on the 1-C atom provided better stability of the radical than another substituent.

This general approach seemed to have been taken by prior workers in the field, for example by Meier et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,247,240, though at the time, it can be assumed they were unaware of the existence of the aroxyl radical. Because he reacted 2,6-di-tert-butyl phenol with an alpha,beta-monoolefinically unsaturated compound such as methyl acrylate, he could never have more than a mono-substituted alpha-C atom, that is, the alpha-C atom could never be a tertiary (that is, fully substituted) C atom. And, of course he could not have provided a substituted acetamide.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,338,833 to Spivack et al., issued soon thereafter, pursued the lead of Meier et al., but with substituted dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl amides having an alkylene (`spacer`) group spacing the amide C atom from the phenyl ring. Again, the alpha-C atom could never have more than a single substituent on the alpha-C atom, that is, the alpha-C atom could never be a tertiary C atom. In the reaction schemes he suggests, he specifies the reactant hydroxyphenyl ester or acid chloride as having a (CH₂)_(n) spacer where n is a small whole number, e.g. 1 or 2. Assuming one decided to impute and extend the enablement embodied in the Spivack '833 teachings to a spacer having a tertiary C atom, and, chose to make a hydroxyphenyl amide spaced from the pheny ring only by the tertiary C atom, one would need to have access to the precursor hydroxyphenyl acid having the structure ##STR2##

or its acyl derivative, wherein R¹ and R² represent alkyl, cycloalkyl, phenyl, alkyl-phenyl, naphthyl and alakyl-naphthyl which serve to hinder the OH group, and R³ and R⁴ represent alkyl substituents, which acid or acyl derivative could then be used to react with an appropriate amine. This 3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl substituted acetic acid, to be used as a precursor is obtained as disclosed in my U.S. Pat. No. 4,523,032 and is not a prior art compound. The corresponding ester, however, is a prior art compound and may be obtained as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,455,994 to Knell. I therefore reacted the ester, namely methyl α-(3,5-di-tert.butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl propionate, which is a prior art compound, with tert-octylamine at 150°-160° C. for 4 hr but failed to find any trace of the expected amide with the tertiary alpha C atom. I then continued the reaction at 160°-170° C. for an additional 2 hr and still failed to obtain the expected product.

To make certain this lack of reactivity was not due at least in part to the steric hindrance of the amine group of the tert-octylamine, I chose to minimize any such effect by substituting a long straight chain alkylamine, namely octadecylamine, for the t-octylamine. I then conducted a reaction with octadecylamine and methyl α-(3,5-di-tert.butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl butyrate in an analogous manner and under the same conditions of reaction as those described immediately hereinabove. I found the octadecylamine failed to react with the methyl α-(3,5-di-tert.butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl butyrate. Only a trace of high mol wt material was detected by mass spectrography. This trace of material was identified as the dimer of the amine having a mol wt of 520. The remaining material consisted of the unrected reactants. No amide with a tertiary alpha-C atom was obtained.

Later, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,787,355, Linhart et al., like Spivack '833, chose an alkylene spacer, but changed the amine believing this might provide more effective stabilization. Like Linhart et al., Spivack also pursued the `bulking of the molecule` as a path to more effective stabilization in U.S. Pat. No. 4,049,713, but retained the alkylene spacer between the ester group, or amide group, and the phenyl ring in his hindered hydroxyphenyl alkanoates and amides. Since he had started with a compound which had either only one substituent on the alpha-C atom, or none, the esters he made were prepared via usual esterification procedures from a suitable alcohol and a carboxylic acid derivative of the substituted hindered phenol of interest, so that it is clear he could never have made an ester with a tertiary alpha-C atom.

In U.S. Pat. No. 4,191,683, Brunetti et al. decided upon a polysubstituted piperidyl alkylamine, or a dimer or trimer of it, without linking their compounds to a hydroxyphenyl moiety, clearly indicating that at that time, there was no suggestion that an aroxyl radical might advantageously be combined with a polysubstituted piperidyl alkylamine, irrespective of what linkage might be used. At least with respect to their dimer and trimer, the emphasis was on bulking the molecule.

It is evident that the opportunity to investigate the stability of an aroxyl radical having a disubstituted alpha C atom did not present itself because the alpha C atom could not be disubstituted. This inability is borne out by the efforts of Rosenberger et al in U.S. Pat. No. 4,197,236, who were able to produce an alkyl (methyl) substituent on a tertiary C atom (see example 3) but were forced to provide an alkylene spacer between the tertiary C atom and the carbonyl C atom, to obviate the steric hindrance and allow the reaction to proceed. When they coupled the alpha C atom to the carbonyl C atom of the carboxyl group (see example 1), the alpha C atom was not disubstituted. However, their pursuit of a "bulked-up" acetamide molecule was successful. They were able to provide two hydroxyphenyl groups on the tertiary C atom with the expectation of providing a more stable diradical. This was a different approach towards the same goal we pursued, namely finding and synthesizing a more effective stabilizer. They opted to cope with the destabilizing effect of the tendency of each of the two radicals connected to the single C atom, to form a quinone methide, but benefitted from the bulked up molecule. We chose to use a single hydroxyphenyl radical in which the stability was enhanced by the lone disubstituted alpha C atom connecting the hydroxyphenyl ring to the carbonyl C atom. Because the generation of an aroxyl radical with enhanced stability is the nexus of the activity of our compounds it is evident that they are distinct and different from the dihydroxyphenyl piperidyl compounds of the '236 patent.

Not long afterwards, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,246,198, Rosenberger et al pursued the notion of bulking the molecule even further by forming a dimer or trimer after bulking the substituent on the 1-C atom of the phenyl ring. In each embodiment he provided an alkylene spacer (C_(x) H_(2x)) in which x is defined as being 0, 1, 2 or 3, optionally in combination with another such alkylene spacer (C_(y) H_(2y)). But the disclosure of the value "0" for x was clearly accidental since there is no suggestion provided to enable one to make such a compound. Nor is there any suggestion that such a compound, which they were earlier unable to make, might now have been made by them in this '198 patent. From the numerous examples given in the specification, it is clear that they did not make such a compound. This is confirmed by their statement that in the preferred compounds they made, x and y are each either 1 or 2. From the foregoing evidence of insurmountable difficulty I encountered in my attempts to produce such a compound by any known synthesis other than the ketoform synthesis, it is clear that those known synthesis could not have been used to make such a compound. Further, it is clear that the amine group in any of their compounds is an amine linkage which must always be a secondary amine --NH--; and the H in this linkage cannot be substituted.

Much later, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,452,884, Leppard disclosed combining a hydroxyphenyl group in which the 3,5-dialkyl substituents would produce a stable aroxyl radical, except that, having recognized that "A" in his structure could not be a disubstituted lone C atom (the alpha C atom), he specified that A is methylene or one of several groups having plural C atoms connecting the hydroxyphenyl group to the carbonyl C atom in his structure. In a subsequent patent (U.S. Pat. No. 4,518,679) Leppard et al disclosed many other piperidinyl derivatives linked to hydroxyphenyl groups with various linkages, none of which has the disubstituted alpha C atom connecting the phenyl ring to an amide carbonyl C atom. Thus it is evident that our 3,5-DHPIPA compounds are distinct and different from the hydroxyphenyl piperidyl compounds of both the '884 and the '679 Leppard patents.

It was in the foregoing framework of related aroxyl radicals with varying degrees of stability, measured as described hereinbelow, that I joined the search for a more stable aroxyl radical than the blue aroxyl radical, and sought to introduce the radical into a compound which might have enhanced stabilization activity.

Though I subscribed to the general notion that some bulking of the 1-C substituent would likely produce enhancement of the staibility of the bulked up aroxyl radical, relative to that of the blue aroxyl radical, there was no clear indication as to what might constitute the `proper` bulking. Many bulked up aroxyl radicals are less stable than the blue aroxyl, but there was no way of linking their activity to the lack of a disubstituted alpha-C atom. The disubstituted alpha-C atom was only present on the blue aroxyl radical in which the 3- and 5-carbons also had substituents which contained a disubstituted C-atom, and there was no particular reason to ascribe greater significance to the presence of such a C-atom in the substituent on the 1-C atom. Nor was there any reason to believe that an amide substituent might be about 50 times more effective than the blue aroxyl radical, and far more effective than other prior art `bulking` substituents, if it could be made to include a disubstituted alpha-C atom.

Apart from the inability to produce a disubstituted alpha C atom with a monohydroxyphenyl group in the structure, it is worth noting that in prior art hindered phenol hydroxyphenylalkleneyl isocyanurates which are antioxidants having superior effectiveness, for example, Irganox 1010, there is at least two C atoms connected to the 1-C atom of the hydroxyphenyl ring. It is this structure which in no small measure accounts for their effectiveness. As will be evident from data presented hereinafter, the compounds of our invention are inferior antioxidants, this property being attributable to the disubstituted alpha C atom; but they have a surprisingly superior stabilizing effect against degradation by ultraviolet light, attributable to the stability of the aroxyl radical formed.

Despite the activity of the 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizers of this invention, they would be of little value if they could not be made in good yields, that is, at least 50%. I found that a good yield of 3,5-DHPIPA was not obtained without one of the 3- or 5-alkyl substituents on the 3,5-DHPIPA being a tertiary alkyl substituent, which dictates one substituent on the 2,6-dialkyl phenol starting material. It is much preferred to have tert.-alkyl substituents on each of the 2- and 6-carbon atoms.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It has been discovered that a N-substituted, N-(polysubstituted-4-piperidinyl) α-(3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-disubstituted acetamide ("3,5-DHPIPA") generates an exceptionally stable hindered acetamide aroxyl radical which is far more stable than the "blue aroxyl radical" derived from 2,4,6-tri-tert.butylphenol, which radical was heretofore adjudged the standard of superior stability and resistance to degradation due to heat, oxygen and light, the compound having been specifically disclosed as a uv-stabilizer.

It is therefore a general object of this invention to provide a class of hindered phenols which are disubstituted acetamides which generate substituted aroxyl radicals far more stable than known aroxyl radicals. The substituents on the alpha-C atom of the precursor provide such great steric hindrance that, when such substituents are present on a 4-hydroxy phenyl ester, used as a precursor for the formation of the desired hindered acetamide by reaction with an appropriately substituted amine, the reaction is negated.

It has also been discovered that a hindered aroxyl amide radical which is at least ten times more stable than the "blue aroxyl radical" heretofore deemed stable, may be generated by 3,5-DHPIPA compounds prepared by a peculiarly effective synthesis known as the ketoform reaction. This ketoform reaction is unexpectedly well-adapted to produce the 3,5-DHPIPA compounds which we have been unable to produce by any other synthesis known to us.

It is therefore a general object of this invention to provide an elegant, yet simple synthesis for the commercial production of 3,5-DHPIPA compounds which are useful as anti-oxidants and light stabilizers, particularly under elevated temperature conditions to which organic materials are subject in the environments in which they are used. The process comprises reacting a 2,6-dialkylphenol, a chloroform or bromoform, and an appropriately substituted aminopolysubstituted piperidine, in the presence of an alkali metal hydroxide to form the desired 3,5-DHPIPA.

It is a specific object of this invention to provide a 3,5-DHPIPA which generates a hindered acetamide aroxyl radical which is so stable that a very small amount of the hindered aroxyl acetamide radical, derived from a compound of this invention which compound is present in the range from about 0.01 to about 1 phr (part per hundred parts organic material to be stabilized), provides satisfactory stability of the material containing the compound.

It is another specific object of this invention to prepare, in excellent yields, particular 3,5-DHPIPA compounds in which the alpha-C atom of the 1-C amide substituent is dialkyl-substituted, and connected to the 4-C atom of a piperidyl group which is one of two substituents on the N atom of the amide group. The 2-C and 6-C carbon atoms of the piperidyl group are fully substituted.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

This search for a more stable aroxyl radical was spurred by the notion that the steric configuration of the alpha-C atom connecting the 1-C atom of the phenyl ring and the carbonyl C atom, peculiarly enhanced the stability of an aroxyl radical. In due course, this search led to amides, and more specifically substituted acetamides, which we hoped, might further enhance the stability of the aroxyl radical. Except, as stated hereinbefore, there was no known way of overcoming the steric hindrance which frustrated the formation of the 3,5-DHPIPA we desired to make and test.

It was only because of the earlier discovery of the ketoform reaction (U.S. Pat. No. 4,466,915 to John T. Lai) for the preparation of a 2-keto-1,4-diazacycloalkane, that we resorted to the use of a ketone and an amine in the presence of a haloform and alkali in a synthesis for the 3,5-DHPIPA. We were happily surprised to find that, despite the lack of similarity between the formation (by cyclization) of a 2-keto-1,4-diazacycloalkane, and the attack of a 1-C atom of a phenyl ring, the combination of an appropriate ketone and amine in the presence of chloroform or bromoform and an alkali, successfully introduced a substituent with a tertiary alpha-C atom on the 1-C atom of the phenyl ring, and generated the substituted acetamide.

Though all hindered phenols (referring to the hindrance of the OH group) have a stabilizing effect, the search for a more effective aroxyl radical requires testing of the radicals derived from a wide option of substituents on the 1-carbon atom of the phenyl ring. Such testing is done by measuring the half-life of each radical. The half life ("t 1/2") is the time it takes for the aroxyl radical to lose 50% of its intensity, as evidenced by the height of the peak registered in an Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) Spectroscope. To make the measurement, 50 ml toluene with potassium ferricyanide and aqueous alkali are placed in a 250 ml three-necked flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer. The solution turns orange. The hindered phenol being tested is dissolved, in 50 ml toluene, and the solution added, a little at a time over about 45 min, to the flask. The solution turns blue-green and is stirred under nitrogen for 2 hr. A 10 ml sample is withdrawn and diluted to 100 ml with toluene to provide a 10⁻³ molar concentration. It is dried by adding Mg₂ (SO₄)₂, then filtered. The filtrate in a tube is then placed in the ESR 'scope and an initial reading is made. Then, after preselected intervals, usually 0.5 hr, the peak height of the sample is again measured, and the procedure repeated until a peak one-half the height of the original peak is registered. The combined intervals of time after which this last measurement was made is defined as the half-life of the radical. A precise half-life is obtained by plotting peak height vs. time.

Representative prior art compounds were prepared and tested following the foregoing procedures. Such compounds were chosen because of (i) the specific nature of substitution on the alpha-C atom, and (ii) the "bulking effect" provided by an unsubstituted, or, a single substituent on the alpha-C atom in the acetamide, or, by a "spacer" as in β-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionamide.

The criticality of the substituents on the alpha-C atom of the acetamide is best demonstrated by comparing three 3,5-DHPA compounds differing only in the linkage connecting the hydroxyphenyl ring to the carbonyl C atom.

In the prior art compounds herebelow, as in the substituted acetamides of this invention, no distinction is made between the effect of substituents on the N atoms, to the extent that each N atom is tertiary and di-alkyl-substituted, except that (i) compound A, disclosed in Spivack '833 has only a single methyl substituent on the alpha-C atom; (ii) compound B disclosed in Spivack '713 has no substituent on the alpha-C atom; and (iii) compound C disclosed in Linhart '355 has an unsubstituted alpha-C atom, but the extra C atom is in the dimethylene spacer connecting the hydroxyphenyl ring to the carbonyl C atom. This compound C differs from those disclosed in U.S. Patent No. Re. 27,004 to Meier, in that the alpha-C atom in the latter may have a single substituent.

The results for the stability of the aroxyl radicals listed herebelow (the crosses represent t-butyl substituents) are derived from such prior art compounds by oxidation with potassium ferricyanide in aqueous alkali. ##STR3## Half life "t 1/2" of each of the above is less than 0.5 hr.

Each of the foregoing prior art radicals is less stable than the blue aroxyl radical which has a half-life of 0.5 hr, deemed very good.

By comparison with prior art aroxyl radicals, those derived from 3,5-DHPIPA compounds of this invention are many times more stable, as evidenced by the following results for the stability of 3,5-DHPIPA aroxyl radicals derived as described hereinabove, from the compounds listed hereunder.

    ______________________________________                                         Compound 1B (made in example 1B herebelow)                                                                Half-life                                           N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-pip-                                                                    51.3 hr                                             eridinyl)-α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxy-                            phenyl)-α-methyl propionamide                                            Compound 8B (made in example 8B herebelow)                                                                78.2 hr                                             N-butyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperi-                                       dyl)-α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-                          α, α-pentamethylene acetamide                                      ______________________________________                                    

From the foregoing results it is evident that the aroxyl radical derived from a compound of this invention is unexpectedly over a hundred times more stable than prior art aroxyl radicals derived from prior art compounds which do not have a disubstituted alpha-C atom. It is not expected that the substituents on the N atom have comparable influence on the stability of the aroxyl radical because of their relatively greater distance.

Test samples are prepared by mixing a predetermined amount of stabilizer into PP in a Brabender Plasticorder fitted with a Cam-Head (mixing chamber). The PP is first masticated for 1.5 min at 190° C. The stabilizer is then added followed by 3 min additional mixing. The stabilized mass of PP is removed and pressed into 20 ml thick sheets from which 1"×1" plaques are cut for oven aging. Type C (3"×0.125" wide) tensile bars are cut for UV stability tests.

Thermal oxidative stability (oven aging) is measured by aging the samples in triplicate in an air-circulating oven at 125° C. The time to failure, indicated by crumbling of the sample when rubbed between the fingers of one hand, was recorded as number of days to failure. Each sample contained 0.1 phr (part of stabilizer per 100 parts of PP).

Samples containing 0.1 phr of stabilizer to be tested are also tested for uv-stability, i.e. resistance to degradation by ultraviolet light. The samples were tested in an Atlas Xenon Weatherometer, Model No. 65-WR, equipped with a 6500 watt Xenon burner tube in accordance with ASTM D 2565-79-A. The black panel temperature was 60° C. The samples were subjected to an 18-min water cycle every 2 hr. The time in hrs to a 50% loss in tensile strength was determined. For a control, and standard for comparison, a sample containing no stabilizer is also tested.

The comparative effectiveness of the stabilization to degradation, by uv-light, provided by compounds having (i) no substituent on the alpha-C atom, (ii) only one substituent on the alpha-C atom, and (iii) two substituents on the alpha-C atom, but keeping the substituents on the N atom the same, is demonstrated by incorporating each, at various levels of concentration, in PP, and testing as stated immediately hereinabove.

    ______________________________________                                                      phr                                                                            0.05     0.1     0.2                                              Compound       hours                                                           ______________________________________                                          ##STR4##      360        510     600                                           ##STR5##      450        615     785                                           ##STR6##      610        820     970                                          ______________________________________                                    

The effectiveness of the 3,5-DHPIPA compounds as stabilizers was tested in an analogous manner by incorporating them in polypropylene (PP) test samples, exposing the samples to a polymer-degrading level of heat and light, and recording the time after which a sample loses 50% of its tensile strength. The test results set forth hereafter are evidence that samples stabilized with a wide variety of substituents on the disubstituted alpha-C atom exhibit excellent stability to uv light.

The foregoing compound of this invention is representative of a N-substituted, N-polysubstituted piperidyl, α-(3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-substituted acetamide, represented by the structure ##STR7## wherein,

R¹ and R² each represent C₁ -C₁₂ alkyl, C₅ -C₈ cycloalkyl, phenyl, naphthyl, alkyphenyl and alkyl-naphthyl each alkyl substituent being C₁ -C₁₂, and at least one of R¹ and R² is t--C₄ -C₁₂ alkyl,

R³ and R⁴ each represent C₁ -C₁₈ alkyl, or, when together cyclized, represent C₅ -C₁₂ cycloalkyl,

R⁵ represents hydrogen, C₁ -C₁₈ alkyl, phenyl, C₁ -C₈ hydroxyalkyl, C₁ -C₈ aminoalkyl, C₁ -C₈ alkoxyalkyl, C₅ -C₁₂ cycloalkyl, and alkylphenyl having C₁ -C₈ alkyl;

R⁶, R⁷, R⁸, R⁹, represents C₁ -C₁₂ alkyl, C₁ -C₈ hydroxyalkyl, C₁ -C₈ aminoalkyl, C₁ -C₈ alkoxyalkyl, and, C₅ -C₁₂ cycloalkyl, and which in combination, R⁶ with R⁷, and R⁸ with R⁹, represent C₅ -C₁₄ cycloalkyl having at least four of the C atoms cyclized;

R¹⁰ is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, oxygen, hydroxyl, C₁ -C₁₈ alkyl and C₁ -C₁₈ acyl.

The process for preparing the foregoing 3,5-DHPIPA compounds comprises reacting a 2,6-dialkylphenol with at least an equimolar quantities of an aliphatic, cycloaliphatic or alkaryl ketone and a 4-amino-polysubstituted piperidine in the presence of an alkali metal hydroxide, preferably at a temperature in the range from about -10° C. to about 50° C.

The 2,6-dialkylphenol reactant is represented by the structure ##STR8## wherein,

R¹ and R² have the same connotations set forth hereinabove. Typical such reactants include 2-methyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-ethyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-propyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-isopropyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-n-butyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 2-n-amyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-isoamyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-heptyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-isooctyl-6-t-butylphenol, 2-isopropyl-6-methylphenol, 2-n-butyl-6-isopropylphenol, 2-isopropyl-6-ethylphenol, 2-n-butyl-6-isopropylphenol, 2-isoamyl-6-ethylphenol, 2-isoamyl-6-methylphenol, 2-isooctyl-6-methylphenol, 2-isooctyl-6-ethylphenol, 2-isooctyl-6-n-propylphenol, 2-isooctyl-6-n-hexylphenol, 2,6-di-(2-phenylpropyl)phenol, 2-methyl-6-(2-phenylpropyl)phenol, etc. the common being most preferred.

The 4-amino-polysubstituted piperidines are N-substituted cyclic alkyleneimines represented by the structure ##STR9## wherein,

R⁵, R⁶, R⁷, R⁸, R⁹ and R¹⁰ have the same connotation as that given hereinbefore. Two or more of the 4-amino-polysubstituted piperidyl moieties may be present on a single molecule, for example, when the moiety is a substituent in each of the two primary amine groups of an alkane diamine; or, of a triamine or tetramine. Preferred substituents are C₁ -C₈ alkyl, branched or unbranched, and, preferred cyclic substituents are C₃ -C₆ cycloalkyl. Typical polysubstituted piperidyls are 4-methylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine; 4-ethylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine; 4-butylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine; N,N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-1,6-hexanediamine, and the like. As before, at least a stoichiometric amount of the amine is used, relative to the amount of 2,6-dialkylphenol, an excess of amine being preferred for good yields. Most preferred is up to a four-fold excess.

The ketone reactant may be a dialkylketone, a cycloalkanone, or alkylcycloalkanone, represented by the structure ##STR10## wherein,

R³ and R⁴ are independently selected from C₁ -C₈ alkyl, preferably acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl n-propyl ketone, diethyl ketone, 2-hexanone, 3-hexanone, di-n-propyl ketone, 2-octanone, methyl isopropyl ketone, and the like; or, when together cyclized, represent C₅ -C₁₂ cycloalkyl, preferably cyclobutanone, cyclopentanone, cyclohexanone, cycloheptanone, cyclooctanone, cyclodecanone, methylcyclopentanone, methylcyclohexanone, dicyclohexyl ketone, and C₁ -C₄ alkyl alkaryl ketones, preferably acetophenone, o-methoxyacetophenone, p-chloroacetophenone, and the like.

It is preferred to use a stoichiometric excess of the ketone, sufficient to provide a solution for the organic reactants, but a greater than ten-fold excess serves no useful purpose. If a ketone solution is unnecessary, less than a two-fold excess is generally found adequate.

Cholorform and bromoform may be interchangeably used, though the former, used in a slight, up to 50% molar excess relative to the 2,6-dialkyl phenol, is preferred. A larger excess greater than 1.5:1.0 simply interferes with work-up of the reaction mass.

The alkali metal hydroxide, typically sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, is preferably used as a powder, or as a conc. aqueous solution, also in molar excess relative to the 2,6-dialkyl phenol, preferably from about a four- to eight-fold excess. Use of less than a four-fold excess will reduce the yield of product.

Although a catalyst may be used, it is not essential, and it is preferred not to use one. When used, preferred catalysts are the onium salts, that is, quarternary compounds of ions derived from Group VA and VIA elements, which compounds have the formula (R'₄ Y)⁺ X⁻ wherein R' is a monovalent hydrocarbon radical including alkyl, aryl, alkaryl, cycloalkyl and like radicals, Y is phosphorus or nitrogen, and X is a halide, hydrogen sulfate, or like ions. Benzyltriethylammonium chloride (BTAC) has been found useful when used in an amount in the range from about 0.01 mole to about 0.1 mole of BTAC per mole of 2,6-dialkylphenol. Other catlaysts useful in the process include tetraalkyl ammonium salts such as tetrabutyl ammonium bromide, tetrabutyl ammonium hydrogen sulfate, methyltrioctyl ammonium chloride, tetraalkyl phosphonium salts such as tetrabutyl phosphonium bromide, cetyltributyl phosphonium bromide, and the like.

A solvent for the organic reactants may be any polar organic solvent, and the ketone reactant itself may also function as the solvent. Commercially available solvents which are useful are methylene chloride, tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, dibutyl ether, dimethyl sulfone, 1,4-di-oxane, carbon tetrachloride, toluene, and the like. The amount of solvent used is not critical, a 5 to 20-fold molar excess relative to the 2,6-dialkylphenol, and preferably a 7.5 to 15-fold excess, being generally used.

While the order of addition of the reactants is not narrowly critical, it is preferred that the alkali metal hydroxide be added last, and over a period of time, to control the reaction which is exothermic, and maintain the temperature below about 30° C., more preferably below about 10° C. The reaction time will vary from about 5 to about 15 hr for small quantities of product.

The 3,5-DHPIPA product is readily isolated from the reaction mass by filtration, and washing the filtrate with aqueous inorganic acid, typically HCl or H₂ SO₄. The filtrate is dried with a desiccant such as sodium sulfate, then heated to dryness. The product obtained may be recrystallized from a solvent if greater purity is desired.

The structure of the 3,5-DHPIPA product is confirmed by elemental analysis for carbon and hydrogen, and infrared (IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra. Molecular weights were determined and confirmed by field desorption mass spectra (FD/MS).

EXAMPLE 1 A. Preparation of N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl propionamide having the structure ##STR11##

0.1 mole of 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 1.0 mole of acetone, 0.15 mole of chloroform, 0.1 mole of 4-methylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine, are charged into a reactor and mixed by stirring while being cooled with circulating cold bath to 5° C. 0.5 mole of powdered NaOH is slowly added over a period of about 1 hr. The reaction mixture is stirred overnight at 10° C. The reaction mixture is then filtered, the solid residue washed with methylene chloride and the wash added to the filtrate. The filtrate is washed with 50 ml of 5% sodium carbonate, and then dried over sodium sulfate. The filtrate is evaporated to dryness and the dried product washed with hexane. The recovered product is a white solid amide which had a melting point of 168°-173° C. and a mol wt of 444.

Elemental analysis shows (%): 75.38 C; 10.76 H; 6.2 N and, calculated (%): 75.67 C; 10.88 H; 6.3 N.

B. Preparation of N-butyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyloctanamide having the structure ##STR12##

Using an analogous procedure to that described in Example 1A hereinabove, and replacing the ketone used therein with 2-octanone, a similar workup of the reaction mass yields a solid having the structure given immediately hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 2 Preparation of Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl ethanecarbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine having the structure ##STR13##

In a manner analogous to that described hereinabove for Example 1, 0.4 mole of 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 4.0 moles of acetone, 0.4 mole of chloroform, 0.1 mole of N,N'-bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-1,6-hexanediamine are charged to a reactor, reacted in the presence of 1.4 mole of NaOH powder added slowly, and worked up to yield an amide which was a solid having a melting point of 255°-260° C. and a mol wt of 983.5. The structure of the amide is confirmed to be that given hereinabove.

Elemental analysis shows (%): 76.40 C; 10.71 H; 5.79 N and, calculated (%): 76.38 C; 10.90 H; 5.84 N.

EXAMPLE 3 Preparation of N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-pentamethylene acetamide having the structure ##STR14##

In a manner analogous to that described hereinabove for Example 1, 0.15 mole of 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 1.2 mole of cyclohexanone, 0.15 mole of chloroform, 0.1 mole of 4-methylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine are charged to a reactor, reacted in the presence of 0.5 mole of NaOH powder added slowly, stirred for 10 hr at no more than 10° C., and worked up by adding 250 ml of water, stirring for 20 min, and filtering to yield an amide which was rinsed with water. Further purification is by recrystallizing from 95% ethanol. A white solid having a melting point of 153° C. is recovered. The structure of the amide is confirmed to be that given hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 4 Preparation of bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-ti-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl propanecarbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine having the structure ##STR15##

In a manner analogous to that described hereinabove for Example 1, 0.4 mole of 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 4.0 moles of 2-butanone, 0.4 mole of chloroform, 0.1 mole of N,N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-1,6-hexanediamine, are charged to a reactor, stirred and cooled to 5° C. The 1.2 mole NaOH beads are added over about 2 hr and stirred overnight after allowing the temperature to rise to about 10° C. The reaction mass is concentrated and stirred with 2 liters of water. The remaining solid is collected and washed with water and heptane. The amide formed is a white solid having a melting point of 227°-231° C. which can be purified by recrystallization from 90% ethanol. The structure of the amide is confirmed to be that given hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 5 Preparation of bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl butanecarbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine having the structure ##STR16##

Using an analogous procedure to that described in Example 4 hereinabove, and replacing the ketone used therein with 2-pentanone, a similar workup of the reaction mass yields a white solid having a melting point of 159°-163° C., and the structure given immediately hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 6 Preparation of bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl propanecarbonyl]}-α-methyl-1,5-pentanediamine having the structure ##STR17##

Using an analogous procedure to that described in Example 4 hereinabove, and replacing the ketone used therein with N,N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-1,5-pentanediamine, using a similar workup of the reaction mass yields a white solid having a melting point of 144°-148° C., and the structure given immediately hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 7 Preparation of N-butyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide having the structure ##STR18##

Using an analogous procedure to that described in Example 4 hereinabove, and replacing the ketone used therein with 4-n-butylamino-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidine), a similar workup of the reaction mass yields a white solid having a melting point of 149°-158° C., and the structure given immediately hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 8 Preparation of N-dodecyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-pentamethylene acetamide having the structure ##STR19##

0.3 mole of 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 0.3 mole of cyclohexanone, 0.45 mole of chloroform, 0.06 mole of 4-N-dodecylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine are charged to a reactor cooled in a water bath. 0.15 mole of NaOH powder is added over 0.5 hr, allowed to warm up to room temperature, and stirred under nitrogen overnight. 50 ml of toluene is added and the layer separated. The aqueous layer is extracted with 50 ml toluene, and the combined organic layers are washed with 50 ml saturated NaCl solution, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated to dryness. Cyclohexanone and excess 4-N-dodecylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine are removed by distillation. The residue is stirred in hexanes and the product is precipitated as a white powder having a melting point of 119°-122° C. The structure of the amide is confirmed to be that given hereinabove.

B. Preparation of N-butyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-pentamethylene acetamide having the structure ##STR20##

In an manner analogous to that set forth for example 8A, by substituting 4-n-butylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine for the previously used 4-n-dodecylamine, the butyl-substituted acetamide represented by the structure directly above, is formed.

EXAMPLE 9 Preparation of N-ethyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyloctanamide having the structure ##STR21##

Using an analogous procedure to that described in Example 8A hereinabove, relacing the ketone used therein with 2-octanone, and replacing the amine used therein with 4-n-ethylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine a similar workup of the reaction mass yields a solid having a melting point of 125°-128° C., and the structure given immediately hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 10 Preparation of N-ethyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide having the structure ##STR22##

Using an analogous procedure to that described in Example 4 hereinabove, and replacing the amine used with 4-N-methylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine a similar workup of the reaction mass yields a white solid having a melting point of 183°-186° C., and the structure given immediately hereinabove.

EXAMPLE 11 Preparation of N-ethyl-N-(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide having the structure ##STR23##

Product from Example 10 (0.02 mole) was mixed with 15 ml 97% formic acid and 0.04 mole of paraformaldehyde. The mixture is heated to 80° C. for 5 hr, then concentrated to dryness. 50 ml of water is added followed by dropwise addition of 50% NaOH until the mixture becomes basic. The solid obtained is collected and washed with water. After drying the solid is further recrystallized from toluene. The melting point of the solid is 212°-216° C.

EXAMPLE 12 Preparation of N-ethyl-N-(1-acetyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide having the structure ##STR24##

Product from Example 10 (0.03 mole) and acetic anhydride (0.45 mole) are refluxed for 10 hr. The mixture is then concentrated and the residue dissolved in 200 ml methylene chloride. The solution is washed with 100 ml 10% NaOH, and 50 ml of satrurated NaCl solution, then dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated. The solid obtained is collected and recrystallized from 60% ethanol. The melting point of the solid is 143°-145° C.

To demonstrate the stabilizing activity of the 3,5-DHPIPA compounds, test samples of polypropylene in which each of the compounds is homogeneously dispersed, are prepared as described hereinbefore.

The following results were obtained for thermal/oxidative stability at 125° C., given in "days to failure" judged by crumbling, for compositions stabilized with specific 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizers

    ______________________________________                                                                 Days                                                   ______________________________________                                         Control (blank)           2                                                    N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-                                                          7                                                    α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl                 propionamide (example 1)                                                       Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-                                                              37                                                   [α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-               .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl ethane-                         carbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine (example 2)                                       ______________________________________                                    

It is evident from the foregoing that the thermal/oxidative stabilizing activity of the 3,5-DHPIPA compounds is lower than that of commercially available materials with two unsubstituted carbon atoms in the link to the hydroxyphenyl ring, such as tris-[3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]-isocyanurate, but 3,5-DHPIPA do contribute to the overall stabilizing power of the compounds and are surprisingly effective against degradation by ultraviolet light.

Samples of PP containing the foregoing stabilizers were also tested for uv stabilizing activity, in the manner described hereinabove. The time to degradation severe enough to cause a 50% loss of tensile strength, is given in hrs. As before, the control was a blank containing no stabilizer.

    ______________________________________                                                                 hrs.                                                   ______________________________________                                         Control (blank)           220                                                  N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-                                                          2450                                                 α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl                 propionamide (example 1)                                                       Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-                                                              1980                                                 [α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-               .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl ethane-                         carbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine (example 2)                                       ______________________________________                                    

The 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizers are particularly effective in polypropylene (PP) fibers, as evidenced by the following tests on PP samples in which 0.1 phr of calcium stearate, 0.1 phr of tris-[3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl]-isocyanurate, and 0.1 phr of the 3,5-DHPIPA being tested, are mixed into the PP until homogeneously distributed.

    ______________________________________                                                                 hrs.                                                   ______________________________________                                         Control (blank)           340                                                  Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-                                                              900                                                  [α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-               .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl ethane-                         carbonyl[}-1,6-hexanediamine (example 2)                                       N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-                                                            1060                                                 α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-penta-         methylene acetamide (example 3)                                                Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-                                                              940                                                  [α-(3,5-di- .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-               .sub.-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl propane-                        carbonyl[}-1,6-hexanediamine (example 4)                                       ______________________________________                                    

The 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizers of this invention provide an exceptional combination of heat stability and resistance to uv degradation when used in polyolefin resins. They are especially effective stabilizers in α-monoolefin homopolymers and copolymers, wherein the α-monoolefin contains 2 to about 8 carbon atoms. High and low density polyethylene, isotactic and atactic polypropylene, polyisobutylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene) have excellent resistance to heat and oxygen when stabilized with combinations of stabilizers of this invention. Ethylene-propylene copolymers and ethylene-propylene terpolymers, generally containing less than about 10 percent by weight of one or more monomers containing multiple unsaturation provided by, for example, 1,4-hexadiene, dimethyl-1,4,9-decatriene, dicyclopentadiene, vinyl norbornene, ethylidene norbornene, and the like, also provide excellent aging using combinations of the stabilizers.

By "combination of stabilizers of this invention" I refer not only to combinations of the 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizers which might be more effective than a single 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizer, but also more particularly, to combinations of a 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizer with known stabilizers, some of which are identified hereafter, for a specific organic material sought to be stabilized in the environment in which it is to be used.

Organic materials which may be stabilized against uv light, thermal and oxidative degradation, include copolymers of butadiene with acrylic acid, alkyl acrylates or methacrylates, polyisoprene, polychloroprene, and the like; polyurethanes; vinyl polymers known as PVC resins such as polyvinyl chloride, copolymers of vinyl chloride with vinylidene chloride, copolymers of vinyl halide with butadiene, styrene, vinyl esters, and the like; polyamides such as those derived from the reaction of hexmethylene diamine with adipic or sebacic acid; epoxy resins such as those obtained from the condensation of epichlorohydrin with bisphenols, and the like; ABS resins, polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, polymethacrylates, polycarbonates, varnish, phenol-formaldehyde resins, polyepoxides, polyesters, and polyolefin homo- and copolymers such as polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene-propylene polymers, ethylene-propylenediene polymers, ethylene vinyl acetate polymers and the like. The 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizers can also be used to stabilize mixtures and blends of oligomeric materials such as ABS resin blends, PVC and polymethacrylate blends, and blends of homopolymers and copolymers such as blends of polypropylene in EPDM polymers.

Most particularly, the 3,5-DHPIPA stabilizers are especially useful as uv-light stabilizers for synthetic resinous materials used in the form of fibers, or in thermoformed shaped articles which are at least partially permeable to visible light, and particularly for those articles which are transparent thereto, such as those made from polyvinylaromatics and polyolefins.

The excellent compatibility of 3,5-DHPIPAs with phenolic antioxidants allows the latter to be used as secondary stabilizers in a mixture which enhances the stability of the composition in which the mixture is used, with predictably good results. When so used, the phenolic AOs preferably range from about 0.1 to about 5 phr of the material to be stabilized. Such hindered phenol AOs are 2,6-di-t-butyl-paracresol; 2,2'-methylene-bis(6-t-butyl-phenol); 2,2'-thiobis(4-methyl-6-t-butyl-phenol); 2,2'-methylene-bis(6-t-butyl-4-ethyl-phenol); 4,4'-butylidene-bis(6-t-butyl-m-cresol); 2-(4-hydroxy-3,5-di-t-butylanilino)-4,6-bis(octylthio)-1,3,5-triazine; benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-(2,4,6-trioxo-1,3,5-triazine-1,3,5(2H,4H,6H)-triyl)tri-2,1-ethanediyl ester (Goodrite®3125); tetrakis[methylene 3-(3',5'-di-t-butyl-4'-hydroxyphenyl)propionate]methane; and particularly commercially available antioxidants such as Irganox 1010, 1035, 1076 and 1093.

Of the other types of AOs used, are the phosphite, o-hydroxy-benzophenone, benzotriazole, and sulfide AOs, the first three generic types having the effect of boosting the uv stability of the composition most unexpectedly.

Certain 3,5-DHPIPAs are found to be more effective as uv light stabilizers than as antioxidants, and others are found to have substantially better antioxidant activity. Therefore, a combination of 3,5-DHPIPAs may be used. Even more effective than a combination of 3,5-DHPIPAs is a combination of a 3,5-DHPIPA with another stabilizer, sometimes referred to as a secondary stabilizer, selected from diphosphites, triaryl phosphites and o-hydroxy-benzophenones or 2-hydroxyphenylbenzotriazole compounds, known to be effective stabilizers for specific synthetic resinous materials, particularly those derived from an acyclic hydrocarbon with single unsaturation.

A stabilized composition of matter is most preferably (a) a polymer which is derived from a singly unsaturated acyclic hydrocarbon, or mixtures or copolymers thereof, in which is dispersed (b) from 0.05 to 5 parts per hundred parts by weight of the polymer, of a mixture of (i) the 3,5-DHPIPA, and, (ii) from 0.05 to about 5 phr of another stabilizer selected from the group consisting of a (a) bis-(dialkylphenyl)pentaerythritol diphosphite, (b) triarylphosphite, (c) o-hydroxy-benzophenone, and (d) a 2-hydroxyphenylbenzotriazole,

said diphosphite represented by the structure ##STR25## wherein R¹¹ is C₃ -C₂₄ alkyl, or di-(C₃ -C₉)alkylphenyl;

said triarylphosphite represented by the structure ##STR26## wherein

R¹² represents t-butyl, 1,1-dimethylpropyl, cyclohexyl or phenyl, and one of R¹³ and R¹⁴ is hydrogen and the other is hydrogen, methyl, t-butyl, 1,1-dimethylpropyl, cyclohexyl or phenyl;

said o-hydroxy-benzophenone represented by the structure ##STR27## wherein R¹⁵ is C₁ -C₂₄ alkyl, and,

said 2-hydroxyphenylbenzotriazole represented by the structure, ##STR28## wherein,

R¹⁶ is lower alkyl or halogen (preferably chlorine); R¹⁷ is lower alkyl, halogen (preferably chlorine), or hydrogen; and, X is chlorine or hydrogen; the ratio of the 3,5-DHPIPA to the secondary stabilizer being in the range from about 5:1 to about 1:5.

For example, a commercially available diphosphite such as bis-(2,4-di-t-butylphenyl)pentaerythritol diphosphite, or distearyl pentaerythritol diphosphite, may be used in combination with about the same amount of the 3,5-DHPIPA; or, a commercially available triarylphosphite such as tris-(2,5-di-t-butylphenyl)-phosphite, tris-(2-t-butylphenyl)-phosphite, tris-(2-t-phenylphenyl)-phosphite, tris-[(2-1,1-dimethylpropyl)-phenyl]-phosphite, tris-[(2,4-di-t-butylphenyl]-phosphite, and the like; or, a commercially available benzophenone such as 2-hydroxy-4n-octoxybenzophenone in combination with about the same amount of the 3,5-DHPIPA; or, a commercially available benzotriazole such as 2-(2'-hydroxy-3',5'-di-t-butylphenyl)-5-chlorobenzotriazole (Tinuvin 327), 2-(2'-hydroxy-3'-t-butyl-5'-methylphenyl)benzotriazole (Tinuvin 326), 2-(2'-hydroxy-5'-methylphenyl)benzotriazole (Tinuvin P), 2-(2'-hydroxy-3',5'-dimethylphenyl)-5-chlorobenzotriazole, 2-(2'-hydroxy-3',5'-di-t-octylphenyl)benzotriazole (Tinuvin 328), and the like, in combination with about the same amount of the 3,5-DHPIPA. 

We claim:
 1. A N-substituted, N-polysubstituted piperidyl, α-(3,5-dialkyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-substituted acetamide, represented by the structure ##STR29## wherein, R¹ and R² each represent C₁ -C₁₂ alkyl, C₅ -C₈ cycloalkyl, phenyl, naphthyl, alkylphenyl and alkyl-naphthyl each alkyl substituent being C₁ -C₁₂, and at least one of R¹ and R² is t--C₄ -C₁₂ alkyl,R³ and R⁴ each represent C₁ -C₁₈ alkyl, or, when together cyclized, represent C₅ -C₁₂ cycloalkyl, R⁵ represents hydrogen, C₁ -C₁₈ alkyl, phenyl, C₁ -C₈ hydroxyalkyl, C₁ -C₈ aminoalkyl, C₁ -C₈ alkoxyalkyl, C₅ -C₁₂ cycloalkyl, and alkylphenyl having C₁ -C₈ alkyl; R⁶, R⁷, R⁸, R⁹, represents C₁ -C₁₂ alkyl, C₁ -C₈ hydroxyalkyl, C₁ -C₈ aminoalkyl, C₁ -C₈ alkoxyalkyl, and, C₅ -C₁₂ cycloalkyl, and which in combination, R⁶ with R⁷, and R⁸ with R⁹, represent C₅ -C₁₄ cycloalkyl having at least four of the C atoms cyclized; R¹⁰ is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, oxygen, hydroxyl, C₁ -C₁₈ alkyl and C₁ -C₁₈ acyl.
 2. The 3,5-DHPIPA of claim 1 wherein,R¹ is C₁ -C₈ alkyl, R² is C₁ -C₅ alkyl, R³ and R⁴ are each C₁ -C₈ alkyl, and together, when cyclized represent cyclohexyl, methylcyclohexyl, cycloheptyl; R⁵ is C₁ -C₈ alkyl; and, R¹⁰ is hydrogen or C₁ -C₈ alkyl.
 3. The 3,5-DHPIPA of claim 2 wherein, at least one of R¹ and R² is t-butyl, or t-amyl; and, R³ and R⁴ are each C₁ -C₄ alkyl.
 4. A 3,5-DHPIPA of claim 3 selected from the group consisting of(1) N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl propionamide; (2) Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl ethanecarbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine; (3) N-methyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-pentamethylene acetamide; (4) Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl propanecarbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine; (5) Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyl butanecarbonyl]}-1,6-hexanediamine; (6) Bis-{N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-N-[α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl propanecarbonyl]}-α-methyl-1,5-pentanediamine; (7) N-butyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide; (8) N-dodecyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α,α-pentamethylene acetamide; (9) N-ethyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methyloctanamide; (10) N-ethyl-N-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide; (11) N-ethyl-N-(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide; and, (12) N-ethyl-N-(1-acetyl,2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl)-α-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-α-methylbutanamide. 